Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!gatech!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!axion!vision!ukpoit!alan
From: alan@ukpoit.co.uk (Alan Barclay)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: The nonexistent operator (along = v. == lines)
Keywords: xor
Message-ID: <1991Apr11.122102.5976@ukpoit.co.uk>
Date: 11 Apr 91 12:21:02 GMT
References: <156@revcan.UUCP> <1991Apr3.184316.11559@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Organization: iT - The Information Technology Business Of The Post Office
Lines: 18

In article <1991Apr3.184316.11559@dg-rtp.dg.com> barnettr@snaggle.rtp.dg.com (Richard Barnette) writes:
>
>    A B | A XOR B    A B | A AND B    A B | A AND B
>   -----+---------  -----+---------  -----+---------
>    F F |    F       F F |    F       F F |    F   
>    F T |    T       F T |    T       F T |    F   
>    T F |    T       T F |    T       T F |    F   
>    T T |    F       T T |    T       T T |    T    
>
>    Given A if F, A AND B is always F; given A is T, A OR B is always
>T.  No such statement can be made for A XOR B;  if A is T, A XOR B is

I take it that the A AND B table should read F,F,T,T as F AND T is F.
-- 
  Alan Barclay
  iT                                |        E-mail : alan@ukpoit.uucp
  Barker Lane                       |        BANG-STYLE : .....!ukc!ukpoit!alan
  CHESTERFIELD S40 1DY              |        VOICE : +44 246 214241