Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf!altger!doitcr!brumuc!de.intel.com!intelhf!ichips!iwarp.intel.com!inews!pima!bhoughto
From: bhoughto@pima.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Side Effects
Message-ID: <3797@inews.intel.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 17:59:41 GMT
References: <1991Apr5.163209.25118@mccc.edu> <1991Apr6.143523.10443@grebyn.com> <1117@gtenmc.UUCP>
Sender: news@inews.intel.com
Organization: Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ
Lines: 12

In article <1117@gtenmc.UUCP> ravim@gtenmc.UUCP (Ravi Kumar Mandava) writes:
>IMHO "?:" operator also guarantees a sequence point, correct if I am wrong.

Only the one after the expression that precedes the `?'

>Just for nitpicking:-  How about "," as a list separator in declarations
>(ex. int i = 0xff, j = i;) ?  I believe this usage also results in sequence.

Appendix B of the standard lists all of the sequence points.

				--Blair
				  "RTAS."