Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3)
Message-ID: <2N25Z10w164w@mantis.co.uk>
Date: 9 Apr 91 13:22:24 GMT
References: <50085@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
Lines: 12

new@ee.udel.edu (Darren New) writes:
> I don't think it has anything to do with machine representations or
> efficiency.  Your definition would exclude Objective-C, Smalltalk, C++,
> and every other dynamically typed language I know except APL.

When did C++ become dynamically typed?


mathew

--
If you're a John Foxx fan, please mail me!