Xref: utzoo rec.music.synth:20452 comp.music:3064
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!ah2e+
From: ah2e+@andrew.cmu.edu (Aaron Noel Hughes)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,comp.music
Subject: Re: Sampler
Message-ID: <sc1914600awYE1bkRO@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 91 16:35:16 GMT
References: <UbzAmHu00UhBE3b40I@andrew.cmu.edu>,
	<1991Apr10.042721.24723@intacc.uucp>
Distribution: na
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 13
In-Reply-To: <1991Apr10.042721.24723@intacc.uucp>

>Contrast this with the Emulator 1.  It came out in 1982 for $8,000.  The
>Mirage even at the original 1986 price of $2000? was in many ways a >better
>machine.

>      ferenc

Let's not forget here that there is a *4* year technology difference
between the two machines.  Just like comparing the Mirage to almost any
sampler today makes the Mirage look like a toy.

=>B^)

Aaron