Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!wotan!moxie!sugar!ficc!taronga!peter
From: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Caller ID problems
Message-ID: <LD63QM3@taronga.hackercorp.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 01:08:21 GMT
References: <1991Apr5.212502.22001@eci386.uucp>
Organization: A corner of our bedroom
Lines: 13

jmm@eci386.uucp (John Macdonald) writes:
> The caller is the one who's privacy has been invaded.  Caller ID
> without convenient blocking ...

I don't think there's much debate that blocking (preferably free
per-call and cheap per-line) is desirable, so long as you know the ID
is blocked. How about considering Caller-Id *with* blocking instead?
This isn't an eastern bazaar where you have to take an outrageous
position and bargain your way down to what you find acceptable.
-- 
               (peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com)
   `-_-'
    'U`