Xref: utzoo alt.privacy:345 comp.org.eff.talk:2060
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!wotan!moxie!sugar!ficc!taronga!peter
From: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: alt.privacy,comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Information Hiding (was: Re: Caller ID problems)
Message-ID: <4E63PS3@taronga.hackercorp.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 01:26:38 GMT
References: <1991Apr06.200706.26190@hoss.unl.edu>
Organization: A corner of our bedroom
Lines: 17

greg@hoss.unl.edu (Lig Lury Jr.) writes:
> This provides the security that the receiver wants, while not infringing
> on the rights of the caller by having numbers visible.  In this case,
> having visible numbers should be an expensive ability, and must be shown
> as necessary on a case-by-case basis.

So you only get the facilities the phone company wants to provide in the CO.

We all know how well that works.

Or will you have to rent stuff that (like a pitney-bowes franking machine)
is unbreakable-into, and you're not allowed to tap your own line. Back to
pre-carterfone, everyone...
-- 
               (peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com)
   `-_-'
    'U`