Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdahl!netcom!jbreeden
From: jbreeden@netcom.COM (John Breeden)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
Subject: Re: Opinions on PC networking (was Re: Any Gotchas?)
Message-ID: <1991Apr13.200011.5451@netcom.COM>
Date: 13 Apr 91 20:00:11 GMT
References: <DROMS.91Apr12232208@jasper.bucknell.edu> <31913@usc>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Netcom - Somewhere in the S.F. Bay Area
Lines: 23

In article <31913@usc> ajayshah@alhena.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes:
>Lets analyse the question.  The three major networking options
>I know of are :
>	Microsoft offerings
>	Novell offerings
>	NFS-based (neither server nor PC-software need be by Sun)
>
>Microsoft's stuff is so terrible, I won't go into it.  I just
>need tell you it's Microsoft: so stay away.  Proprietary, anemic,
>ill-debugged, poor admin tools, ignorance of the computer industry,
>etc., all the usual Microsoft signs.
>

And it's *real* comforting to know that Netware is *none* of the 
above :-) (:.,/s/Microsoft/Novell/g).

-- 
 John Robert Breeden, 
    jbreeden@netcom.com, apple!netcom!jbreeden, ATTMAIL:!jbreeden
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 "The nice thing about standards is that you have so many to choose 
  from. If you don't like any of them, you just wait for next year's 
  model."