Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: v01INF1:  Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
Message-ID: <9418:Apr1121:48:4291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 91 21:48:42 GMT
References: <1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca>
Organization: IR
Lines: 14

Should the referenced message (originally in comp.sources.reviewed as
well) have been cross-posted here? I don't think so, but I'm not sure.

(I know it should have had Followup-To: comp.sources.d.)

In article <1991Apr11.022612.2522@rick.doc.ca> csr@calvin.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick) writes:
> There has been a lot of activity "behind-the-scenes" among the reviewers
> in getting the newsgroup setup.

Of course. So all the people who voted for the group are now getting
a group that may only loosely correspond to what was proposed at first.
This isn't a flame, just an observation.

---Dan