Xref: utzoo comp.sources.wanted:16231 comp.sources.d:6778 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!mintaka!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!jik From: jik@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) Newsgroups: comp.sources.wanted,comp.sources.d Subject: Re: Updated rz/sz (Zmodem) for Unix and VMS now available Keywords: modem,xmodem,ymodem,zmodem,unix,vax,vms,omen,forsberg Message-ID: <1991Apr12.213654.12032@athena.mit.edu> Date: 12 Apr 91 21:36:54 GMT References: <22317@yunexus.YorkU.CA> <75@omen.UUCP> Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system) Followup-To: comp.sources.d Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 32 (Note the cross-post and Followup-To.) In article <75@omen.UUCP>, caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) writes: |> In article <22317@yunexus.YorkU.CA> rreiner@yunexus.YorkU.CA (Richard Reiner) writes: |> -Why were the -a, -b, and -y options removed from this version? |> |> They are supported whan passed from the sending program. |> The new Rz also supports Crash Recovery. According to one of the people at my site who uses rx for transferring files to our Unix box fairly often: >The "sending program" usually does NOT have a -a option, since the sending >program is usually a standard PC software, with standard xmodem transfers. >The Unix end should be able to do it, even if the PC end is not using >Forsberg's program. So, if it's true that there are some sending programs that do not know how to specify -a, -b and -y when sending, then shouldn't the flags have been left in the receiving programs? And, if not, then how does my user get around the problem that his xmodem sending program doesn't know how to automatically tell the receiver to do the -a, -b, -y conversions, and there's no way to manually tell the receiver to do the conversions? -- Jonathan Kamens USnail: MIT Project Athena 11 Ashford Terrace jik@Athena.MIT.EDU Allston, MA 02134 Office: 617-253-8085 Home: 617-782-0710