Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usenet!ogicse!intelhf!ichips!inews!bishop!bhoughto
From: bhoughto@bishop.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Is va_list defined by <stdio.h>?
Message-ID: <3769@inews.intel.com>
Date: 11 Apr 91 00:53:38 GMT
References: <11852@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <16965@hoptoad.uucp> <15781@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: news@inews.intel.com
Organization: Intel Corp, Chandler, AZ
Lines: 14

In article <15781@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>Many of the top C experts in the world disagreed with you.
>I think the standard has this exactly right.

Is there a good reason why v*printf() aren't declared in <stdarg.h>?

The only one I can think of is an issue of categorization
that seems to have overwhelmed one of usage.

How could you use v*printf() without <stdarg.h>?

				--Blair
				  "I'm still avoiding varargs by
				   proper top-down design..."