Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:38175 comp.std.c:4685
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!jrdzzz.jrd.dec.com!tkou02.enet.dec.com!jit345!diamond
From: diamond@jit345.swstokyo.dec.com (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.std.c
Subject: Re: difference between c++; and ++c;
Message-ID: <1991Apr12.100933.2854@tkou02.enet.dec.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 10:09:33 GMT
References: <1991Apr08.161444.10025@cs.ruu.nl> <1991Apr11.151933.25867@ingres.Ingres.COM>
Sender: usenet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (USENET News System)
Reply-To: diamond@jit345.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond)
Followup-To: alt.folklore.computers
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Japan , Tokyo
Lines: 12

In article <1991Apr11.151933.25867@ingres.Ingres.COM> mikes@ingres.com (Mike Schilling) writes:
>We old folks use:
>	c++;
>	--c;

Some of us older folks didn't want to bother learning PDP-11 machine language,
and DIDN'T learn to do it that way!

This one gets follow-ups to alt.folklore.computers.
--
Norman Diamond       diamond@tkov50.enet.dec.com
If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.