Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!es1 From: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: NeXT/Amiga Flamage: Get a life. Message-ID: <1991Apr10.165806.22821@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 10 Apr 91 16:58:06 GMT References: <&5aGlabl1@cs.psu.edu> <1991Apr10.005729.22997@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Sender: usenet@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Network News) Reply-To: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 21 Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu In article melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: > >You can do animation on >the NeXTstation color, but I'm not exactly sure how much on this >either since I haven't scrutinized a color machine . > >-Mike Look, I like the NeXT too. I think there are some really great ideas behind it, and I'd rather use one than a Mac or an IBM. But PLEASE, are you SERIOUS? Your militancy should only go just so far! You are going to animate a 12 bit-plane screen under display postscript? You'd have to only animate a tiny portion of the screen to get anything real. Also, when you say animate, most of the people in the Amiga newsgroups are used to 15fps+ framerates. -- Ethan Q: How many Comp Sci majors does it take to change a lightbulb A: None. It's a hardware problem.