Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!spool.mu.edu!uunet!pyrdc!grebyn!ckp From: ckp@grebyn.com (Checkpoint Technologies) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: What the heck IS "Interactive TV"? (long) Message-ID: <1991Apr12.132858.19965@grebyn.com> Date: 12 Apr 91 13:28:58 GMT References: <1991Apr11.090415.5276@ncsu.edu> <1991Apr11.143222.13728@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1991Apr11.163702.13171@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Organization: Grebyn Timesharing Lines: 28 [ Since this group is equivalent to /flames, I'm taking a bit of liberty here... ] In article <1991Apr11.163702.13171@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> nkb@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Norman K Bucknor) writes: >At the price point indicated, I don't think CDTV is going to be that >successful. Most consumer electronics products don't generally take off until >they drop below the $500 mark (e.g. VCRs, CD players etc.) and CDTV could >wind up having the same fate as the laserdisc player-a great technology that >nobody bought because there were cheaper, albeit inferior, alternatives. >Ditto CD-I unless they can make them cheap enough (which maybe the Japanese >can). I would think most such products would likely end up in >schools as a cheaper alternative to interactive laserdisc systems. Here's what I think: Commodore releases CDTV now at an artificially high price, to recoup development costs quickly by soaking the first few, pioneering buyers. Then when CD-I appears, Commodore lowers CDTV's price to $500, like they've already promised, while CD-I is either delayed by additional cost-cutting measures or else dies on the shelves next to CDTV because of fewer titles and far higher price. In other words, it's just business. -- First comes the logo: C H E C K P O I N T T E C H N O L O G I E S / / ckp@grebyn.com \\ / / Then, the disclaimer: All expressed opinions are, indeed, opinions. \ / o Now for the witty part: I'm pink, therefore, I'm spam! \/