Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: conan@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Robert Faulkner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Amiga/NeXT flames (Was Re: Amiga OS *IS* state...)
Summary: Leave it alone !!
Message-ID: <47113@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 12 Apr 91 21:20:24 GMT
References: <46907@ut-emx.uucp> <a3yw02=F061501@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <12622@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <b0bN02bW06s401@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: conan@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Robert Faulkner)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Texas ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
Lines: 17
In-reply-to: kls30@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Kent L Shephard)
Originator: conan@dopey.cc.utexas.edu

How about renaming this news section as comp.amiga.next.wars, Come on
people you are wearing this one out.  THe NeXT is a good machine for
what it does and no one can prove otherwise.  Just because it is not an 
Amiga, and it runs in the same Processor Family, does not mean it is
open season for a kill. Besides if most of you could own a NeXT you
would.  Or at Least I would.  Why not perform some useful function as to
advocate the introduction of Virtual Memory on the Amiga, or even certain
programming styles and principles. Lets get useful and not critical.
In other words get constructive not destructive.

A concerned subscriber,
-- 

Robert Faulkner                              conan@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
            ///                  Recursion:     Thinking
        \\\///    University of Texas                 about
         \\//   Amiga Computers                     Thinking