Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!isc-br!ewu!mpierce From: mpierce@ewu.UUCP (Mathew Pierce) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: Amiga/NeXT flames (Was Re: Amiga OS *IS* state...) Message-ID: <1524@ewu.UUCP> Date: 13 Apr 91 23:51:23 GMT References: <46907@ut-emx.uucp> <47113@ut-emx.uucp> Distribution: na Organization: Eastern Washington Univ. Cheney WA Lines: 28 In article <47113@ut-emx.uucp>, conan@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Robert Faulkner) writes: [stuff deleted in interest of brevity.] > open season for a kill. Besides if most of you could own a NeXT you > would. Or at Least I would. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ That's right, at least YOU would, I on the other hand would NOT! I like my Amiga, a lot better than nExt, and have made this decision from experience! > Why not perform some useful function as to > advocate the introduction of Virtual Memory on the Amiga, or even certain I don't want virtual memory on the Amiga, because that would mean that I would have to buy a bigger harddisk, and it would slow down my apps. I have three megs of RAM and a 44meg syquest, VM would screwup my setup and push the Amiga past my finacial capabilities. > programming styles and principles. Lets get useful and not critical. > In other words get constructive not destructive. > > A concerned subscriber, > -- > > Robert Faulkner conan@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu > /// Recursion: Thinking > \\\/// University of Texas about > \\// Amiga Computers Thinking