Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Subject: Re: A3000UX vs. Sun Sparc
In-Reply-To: sjk@ut-emx.uucp's message of 17 Feb 91 03:36:48 GMT
Message-ID: <0&1G2r9p1@cs.psu.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
References: <44277@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 91 16:47:01 GMT
Lines: 13


In article <44277@ut-emx.uucp> sjk@ut-emx.uucp (bob) writes:

   So, can anyone start an intelligent debate comparing 3000UX (200MB
   drive and 8+MB RAM) vs. bottom line Sparcstation? Forgive me if
   this was done before, but I haven't seen it, yet. 

Why bother since the NeXT is a better deal than the bottom of the line
Sparc?  Now if you want to start comparing the NeXT to the Sparcs with
the graphics accelatator then there might be something to talk about.

-Mike