Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!cbmvax!peter From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications Subject: Re: WorkBench 2.0 Message-ID: <20556@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 11 Apr 91 15:35:31 GMT References: <20515@cbmvax.commodore.com> Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) Organization: Commodore-Amiga, Inc. West Chester, PA. Lines: 22 In article bobl@graphics.rent.com (Bob Lindabury - SysAdm) writes: >Well, obviously Peter should know what Workbench 2.0 will require but >at the moment it *doesn't* require Kickstart 2.0 in ROM. The ROM is >located on the HD (or floppy) and is loaded into a special place in >fast RAM so my logical conclusion is that Workbench 2.0 doesn't >require Kickstart in ROM. I presume (and hope) you're describing an Amiga 3000. The question was from a 1.3 user wanting information on upgrading to 2.0. Clearly then, the answer I gave is for people who have Amigas other than the Amiga 3000, and such computers will normally require a ROM. >> Peter > >-- Bob Peter -- Peter Cherna, Operating Systems Development Group, Commodore-Amiga, Inc. {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter peter@cbmvax.commodore.com My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail."