Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!cbmehq!cbmger!amiux!holgerl From: holgerl@amiux.UUCP (Holger Lubitz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio Subject: Re: Protracker vs Med debate Message-ID: Date: 11 Apr 91 22:45:50 GMT References: <1991Apr02.040410PM.8929@demon.co.uk> <14185@helios.TAMU.EDU> <1149@tuura.UUCP> Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Organization: Teuwag Lines: 27 In article <1149@tuura.UUCP> mattij@tuura.UUCP (Matti Joutkoski) writes: >I see a lot. It is UGLY, it doesn't look like a professional SW should to. >But is there REALY any musicians, who are using this MED? I haven't seen. Could you stop this senseless MED flaming ? It is neither supposed to look like "professional SW" since it isn't, nor is it supposed to satisfy just about everybody's needs and wishes. MED is just a freeware program - BTW: It's even a great one. And here am I once again: I USE MED AND I LIKE IT ! I am even thinking of converting all my old, still unpublished Soundtracker-Songs from 1987/88 to MED, using its new features and maybe even some synthetic sound effects instead of the original samples. Hmm, but then again I am used to the samples in these songs... Looks like I'll just have to find out how good they'll sound in MED with some synthetical instruments instead of the samples... Ah, yes: Please note the Follow-Up ! Best regards, Holger -- Holger Lubitz, Kl. Drakenburger Str. 24, D-W-3070 Nienburg/Weser