Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!cole From: cole@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: A2091 conclusions Message-ID: <1991Apr10.123648.29592@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu> Date: 10 Apr 91 12:36:48 CDT References: <18d500f6.ARN0f22@cbmami.UUCP> <20252@cbmvax.commodore.com> Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services Lines: 36 In article <20252@cbmvax.commodore.com>, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) writes: > In article <18d500f6.ARN0f22@cbmami.UUCP> jason@cbmami.UUCP writes: >>At one point CBM Engineers routinly discused the problem and often >>suggested that reselection be turned off (which it definately is on my two >>quantum drives). Now no CBM Engineer seems willing to utter the word >>A2091, does this mean "something is in the works don't bug us" or does it >>mean "trade in for a GVP"? The vibes I am getting suggest the later. > > I've been busy, and got to this group for the first time in a month > or more (as you can see by the string of postings this follows... :-) > The former is more accurate (you can start holding your breath). > >>All I really want is to know where I stand and what I should do, I am not >>looking for any promises or free fixes! > > Understood. I'm trying to be of help, and have been a champion of > all of your causes when possible. You should see results RRSN. Sorry, I > really can't say more yet. (and as usual, read my disclaimer) > > -- > Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering. > {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com BIX: rjesup > Disclaimer: Nothing I say is in anything other than my personal opinion. > Thus spake the Master Ninjei: "To program a million-line operating system > is easy, to change a man's temperament is more difficult." > (From "The Zen of Programming") ;-) Dear sir, Is there any way in hell you could be more vague about your answer to the previous question? sincerely, another A2091 owner Thomas Cole