Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!herald.usask.ca!alberta!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!mintaka!olivea!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!am.dsir.govt.nz!marcamd!mercury!kcbbs!kc
From: Clarke_Anderson@kcbbs.gen.nz (Clarke Anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Is ARP orphaned?
Message-ID: <1991Apr11.210700.6371@kcbbs.gen.nz>
Date: 11 Apr 91 21:07:00 GMT
Lines: 6
Organisation: Kappa Crucis Unix BBS, Auckland, New Zealand

i always understood that C=, had, in their infinite wisdom <ha!> taken 
the ARP and used and abused it in the making of DOS 2. therefor, a new 
ARP wouldn't be practical, except to improve on DOS 2, which C= are 
doing all the time anyway. 

of course i could be wrong??