Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!motcsd!starnet!sschaem
From: sschaem@starnet.uucp (Stephan Schaem)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Is ARP orphaned?
Message-ID: <1991Apr15.012708.10295@starnet.uucp>
Date: 15 Apr 91 01:27:08 GMT
References: <m0jPrZq-0003NFC@meepmeep.pcs.com> <peter.671363420@cutmcvax.cs.curtin.edu.au> <12603.2804db1f@zeus.unomaha.edu> <peter.671616714@cutmcvax>
Organization: Starnet-Public Access UNIX-Los Altos,CA 415-949-3133, login:info
Lines: 10


 I still find ARP dos function mucth better than 2.0.
 I even have to keep arp and amigados at the same time! (of course I
 dont use the deadly arp functiom on 2.0).
 The best part are the use of patterns, and the best example rename.
 And they are still alot faster than 2.0.
 To bad CBM didn't use the format, To bad the source are not available
 for 2.0 modification etc...

								Stephan