Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!bacchus!mwm From: mwm@pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) Subject: Re: Bugginess of compilers (Was: Re: DICE vs GCC) In-Reply-To: ben@epmooch.UUCP's message of 10 Apr 91 20:30:00 GMT Message-ID: Sender: news@pa.dec.com (News) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica References: <9104021420.AA10848@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca> <1991Apr4.034920.16298@marlin.jcu.edu.au> <1991Apr4.180217.19773@nntp-server.caltech.edu> <1991Apr5.030228.28756@marlin.jcu.edu.au> <966@boing.UUCP> <1991Apr7.172821.13328@santra.uucp> <968 Date: 12 Apr 91 10:52:45 Lines: 19 >In article <968@boing.UUCP> dale@boing.UUCP (Dale Luck) writes: >We don't wish to be in the business of fixing compiler bugs, that's why >we pay for commercial software; so we have someone we can call up on the >phone and complain to or send email. Usually there is a way to code >around the problem until the bug is actually fixed. SAS has shown an >immense improvement in support in the last 2 years. Actually, that's not an excuse for GCC. There's a couple of companies on the SF Peninsula that sell support for GCC. I haven't tried asking them about the Amiga version, but I wouldn't be surprised if they'd do bug fixing.