Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!ilan343 From: ilan343@violet.berkeley.edu (Geraldo Veiga) Subject: Re: Difference between 386/33 & 486/25 not counting fp Message-ID: <1991Apr12.073828.20663@agate.berkeley.edu> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator) Organization: University of California, Berkeley References: <1163@gistdev.gist.com> <1991Apr9.085749.4568@agate.berkeley.edu> <1164@gistdev.gist.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1991 07:38:28 GMT Lines: 40 In article <1164@gistdev.gist.com> flint@gistdev.gist.com (Flint Pellett) writes: > >(they publish results of 5 different tests in 4 different OS'es and >about 4 different price categories. Performance ratios between 386 >and 486 machines seem to follow the same ratios as the ones below.) > >DOS 386 Systems: Dhrystone Price >Micro Express /33 15,870 $4,998 >Laser Ditigal 386/33 15,750 $4,296 >Arche Legacy 386/33 17,134 $8,665 >Northgate 386/33 17,131 $8,919 > >AST 486/33 34,192 $4,490 (upgrade board) >Club American Hawk III 35,923 $6,495 >NCR PC486/MC 33 35,234 $14,995 > >The Dhrystone numbers drop down to around 12K for the 386 machines >at 25 MHz and down to 26K for the 486's at 25 MHz. Unless your >arithmetic is different than mine, that works out to about >twice as fast, not 50% faster. How different can the performance of different brands of 486 motherboard be? The numbers above look highly inflated compared to what I can get in my system. I have a 486/25 with 128K cache, based on the OPTI chipset. Under DOS, QAPlus rates it at 15172 Dhrystones. Under ISC Unix, Drhystone 2.1 (source code from netlib, compiled with gcc) gives a reading of ~~ 17000. This is the best I can get, with all memory addresses cached. Can different motherboard designs give such radically improved performance? I suppose the more likely explanation is that the benchmark code is not the same. The only change I made to the Dhrystone code was the HZ constant used in the timing routine (from 60 to 100). Can anyone enlighten me on this one?