Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!noao!arizona!dwebster
From: dwebster@cs.arizona.edu (Dave E. Webster, Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: PC-Cache (from PC Tools) and SMARTDRV.SYS
Summary: Problems w/ PC-CACHE and RAM Disks
Keywords: PCTools
Message-ID: <1378@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 91 21:25:50 GMT
References: <1991Apr11.013231.27119@hellgate.utah.edu> <4541@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
Lines: 14

In article <4541@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> huffman@se-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Bill Huffman) writes:
=>
=>Does Windows 3.0 work with PC-Cache?
>
>I couldn't get PC-Cache to work with any RAMDISK, so I switched to
>SMARTDRV.

You may want to recheck your settings.  I am using pc-cache (v 6.0) set with
1MB of cache (in extended memory), a 1MB VDISK.SYS ramdisk (included with
DOS 3.3, also in extended memory), QEMM 5.1, DesqView 386, Windows 3.0, and 
a couple of TSR's and I have never had a problem.  PC-CACHE is much faster
than smartdrv, and has a few nice options as well.  Of course, windows 3.0
will not dynamically adjust the RAM size of PC-CACHE like it can with 
smartdrv, but I prefer the speed that the large cache gives me anyway.