Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!munnari.oz.au!goanna!minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au!s907396 From: s907396@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au (Eugene Mok (Miramar)) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: TELEMATE VS. PROCOMM Message-ID: <1991Apr13.060300.18351@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au> Date: 13 Apr 91 06:03:00 GMT Article-I.D.: minyos.1991Apr13.060300.18351 References: <1991Apr12.170914.29344@uvm.edu> Organization: RMIT Computer Centre, Melbourne Australia. Lines: 21 blaise@kira.UUCP (Christopher Blaise) writes: >> cb@timbuk.cray.com >Speaking of Telemate, has anyone had major problems with it crashing? >I would really rather use Telemate because of it's excellent mouse support and >windows, but the damn thing randomly crashes on my 386-25! Yes, it crashes quite often on my 386-25. And the wierd thing is after every crash, 2 of my files, dosedit.com and mouse.com, gets overwritten by portions of Telemte's scroll-back buffer. There could be more files that were corrupted but I haven't found anything else yet. I really liked Telemate but for the above problem and and the fact that it's really memory hungry. The multitasking features are excellent but now that I'm using Desqview, I've gone back to Telix or Commo when I need more memory. -- -----/ _ _ \-------------------------------------------------------------------- | o o | Eugene Mok s907396@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au (Melbourne OZ) \ ^ / eugene@pogo.ai.mit.edu (USA) ------\ o /---------------------------------------------------------------------