Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!mace.engin.umich.edu!chau
From: chau@caen.engin.umich.edu (Hin Fai Chau)
Subject: Re: Disk deframgmentation software - SUMMARY
Message-ID: <1991Apr13.194118.16907@engin.umich.edu>
Sender: news@engin.umich.edu (CAEN Netnews)
Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
References: <10390@pitt.UUCP> <1991Apr12.214311.2063@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1991 19:41:18 GMT

In article <1991Apr12.214311.2063@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> smsmith@hpuxa.acs.ohio-state.edu (Stephen M. Smith) writes:
>In article <10390@pitt.UUCP> jonathan@cs.pitt.edu (Jonathan Eunice) writes:
>Hmmmm....  I just downloaded DOG two days ago, and *I* didn't
>read anything about incompatibility with DOS 4.x.  In fact,
>here are a couple of excerpts from DOG's documentation:
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Disk OrGanizer, version 3.01, March 12, 1991
>
>   This is the first public release of Disk OrGanizer version 3.
>
>   This version is compatable with DOS version 4 and 5.
>
>   EMS memory will be used, if available, for large disks.
>
>   Disk OrGanizer will work on drives as large as
>   4,095 Megabytes (4,294,180,868 bytes).
>
>        Disk  OrGanizer  has  been  tested with MS-DOS 2.10, 3.01, 3.10,
>        3.30, 4.01 and 5.0 on logical drives as large as 600  megabytes.
>        It is believed that Disk OrGanizer will operate on any MS/PC-DOS
>        disk.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>I have DOS 4.01 and a 200 MEG IDE drive, with 3 logical drives (C:,
>D:, and E:).  I have not used DOG yet, so SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME
>MORE INFO BEFORE I TRASH MY DRIVE with this program.
>
I have DOS 4.01 and a 105 MEG IDE drive.  I used the latest version of
DOG (3.03, 19 March 1991) yesterday without any problems.

Hin-Fai Chau
chau@caen.engin.umich.edu