Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!bloom-beacon!mit-eddie!media-lab!mjkobb
From: mjkobb@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU (Michael J Kobb)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: II -> IIfx mother-of-all-boards upgrade info needed
Summary: fx design flaws???
Message-ID: <5652@media-lab.MEDIA.MIT.EDU>
Date: 13 Apr 91 02:21:50 GMT
References: <1991Apr12.230716.23547@cs.ubc.ca>
Reply-To: mjkobb@media-lab.media.mit.edu (Michael J Kobb)
Distribution: na
Organization: MIT Media Lab, Cambridge MA
Lines: 12

In article <1991Apr12.230716.23547@cs.ubc.ca> Sundar_Prasad@mtsg.ubc.ca (Sundar) writes:
>
>It seems there was an article in a recent MacWeek on design flaws in the 
>IIfx. If that report is correct, is it worth going on this upgrade trip in 
>the first place ? Thanks in advance for any pointers.

Eh?  I must have missed this.  Can anyone elaborate on these supposed design
flaws.  I'm considering the IIx --> IIfx upgrade myself.

Thanks!

-Mike