Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!hsvaic!george From: george@hsvaic.boeing.com (George Williams) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: Just My Opinion: MS Word 4.0 vs. Nisus Message-ID: <236@hsvaic.boeing.com> Date: 11 Apr 91 11:40:04 GMT References: <4329@ryn.mro4.dec.com, 17133@burdvax.PRC.Unisys.COM> Reply-To: george@hsvaic.boeing.com Distribution: na Organization: Boeing AI Center, Huntsville, AL Lines: 37 long@mcntsh.enet.dec.com (Rich Long) and dave@PRC.Unisys.COM (David Lee Matuszek) write about Nisus... > >[about Word and Nisus] > To his comments let me add that I have tried the Nisus demo, and like it (but > WHY didn't they include the help file?). My beefs are: > o RAM based. Uh-uh. Nope. Makes it darn hard to read LARGE files. Qued > has the same problem. > o No tables. I use this Word feature ALL the time. I want this > integrated, not some random add-on program. > o No color drawing on color Macs. > If these things are fixed, I might buy Nisus, because it is nifty in other > ways. I also tried the demo, though only briefly. I didn't switch from FullWrite because one of the most important things to me is an integrated outliner. MSWord has one, but the user interface is awful. I understand that there are other outliners (e.g., Acta) and other word processing programs that either aren't as full-featured as FullWrite or have ugly user interfaces. Except for the outliner, I would probably have bought Nisus. I really like the idea of being able to use it to edit source code and have font and style changes that I see but that the compilers don't. Hmm..., What would an outline look like to a compiler? I guess I'd want the ability to say whether or not the titles, heading numbers, and such were hidden (in the resource fork). George Williams Boeing Computer Services Internet: george@hsvaic.boeing.com POBox 240002, M/S JY-58 UUCP: ...!uw-beaver!bcsaic!hsvaic!george Huntsville AL 35824-6402 Phone: 205+464-4968 FAX: 205+464-4930 BTN: 464-4968