Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!vd09+
From: vd09+@andrew.cmu.edu (Vincent M. Del Vecchio)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: C compiler weirdness?
Message-ID: <4c1t__C00awOQePc4g@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 13 Apr 91 23:21:46 GMT
References: <1991Apr8.023545.11197@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <4597.on.Mon,.8.Apr.91.18:32:50.EDT.@sct60a.sunyct.edu>,
	<1991Apr12.175909.5194@helios.physics.utoronto.ca>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 9
In-Reply-To: <1991Apr12.175909.5194@helios.physics.utoronto.ca>

I'm not sure I understand what the discussion is about here, though I'd like
to.  Is the complaint that pc gets incremented after the function returns,
instead of immediately before?  In other words, the correct function gets
called, but pc has a "wrong" value during the execution of the function?

Or is it something else?

-Vincent Del Vecchio
vd09@andrew.cmu.edu