Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
From: gl8f@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Edit your subjects (was IRC Net Bandwidth)
Message-ID: <1991Apr9.145024.14464@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 9 Apr 91 14:50:24 GMT
References: <27773:Apr420:02:0691@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <11813@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <28077:Apr700:18:3191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Lines: 7

In article <28077:Apr700:18:3191@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:

>The big question: Can they still do it with 2-byte packets?

The bigger question: why is IRC still in the subject when it seems to
average 80 byte packets? If you really want to talk about IRC's
packets, then talk about TCP tuning.