Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!evax!texas!ylee
From: ylee@csl.dl.nec.com (Ying-Da Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: sendmail shock.  Bibliography?
Message-ID: <1991Apr11.194455.27270@csl.dl.nec.com>
Date: 11 Apr 91 19:44:55 GMT
References: <1991Apr2.180215.1356@sci34hub.sci.com> <BARNETT.91Apr3153827@grymoire.crd.ge.com> <1991Apr7.164824.2586@engin.umich.edu>
Organization: NEC America, C & C Software Development Lab
Lines: 13

In article <1991Apr7.164824.2586@engin.umich.edu> stealth@caen.engin.umich.edu (Mike Pelletier) writes:
>This "ease" thing is just a more verbose way of writing sendmail.cf files,
>with perhaps a more amenable learning curve.  You're saying precisely the
>same things in an english derivative, but I think that the main problem that
>people have with sendmail.cf files is not how you say it, but rather what
>you say.  And the "ease" system doesn't address that at all.  It just makes
>sendmail configuration less like writing line noise.

Well put.  My sentiment exactly.  Also, if you get to the
point of debugging or testing (-bt with sendmail), you HAVE TO deal with
sendmail.cf syntax anyway.

	Ying-Da Lee