Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!rex!uflorida!gatech!wrdis01!nstn.ns.ca!bonnie.concordia.ca!IRO.UMontreal.CA!matrox!matrox.com!magrethea.matrox.com!jstark
From: jstark@magrethea.matrox.com (John A. Stark)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: X386 on AT&T lockup problem
Message-ID: <1991Apr13.162338.20814@pandora.matrox.com>
Date: 13 Apr 91 16:23:38 GMT
References: <1991Apr12.122901.379@virtech.uucp>
Sender: news@pandora.matrox.com (Usenet Administration)
Reply-To: jstark@magrethea.matrox.com
Organization: Matrox Electronic Systems
Lines: 17

In article <1991Apr12.122901.379@virtech.uucp>, cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
 > together a separate newsgroup: comp.unix.sysv386.x386 or comp.windows.x.x386
 > which is dedicated to this product?
 > 

Or at least urge those who are having problems with X386 to post into the
proper newsgroup, which is comp.windows.x.  I am getting tired of slogging through
X Window related stuff in a Sysv UNIX newsgroup.

 > What do you think?

I agree whole-heartedly.

--
| John A. Stark               | email: jstark@magrethea.matrox.com        | 
| Software Design Engineer    | uunet: ..!uunet!matrox!magrethea!jstark   |
| Matrox Electronic Systems   | tele.: (514) 685-7230 ext. 2312           | 
| "It's all fun and games until someone loses conciousness"	          |