Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!coyote!ejm
From: ejm@coyote.datalog.com (E.J. McKernan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: X386 on AT&T lockup problem
Message-ID: <1991Apr14.022422.6177@coyote.datalog.com>
Date: 14 Apr 91 02:24:22 GMT
References: <1991Apr12.122901.379@virtech.uucp>
Organization: Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ
Lines: 19

In article <1991Apr12.122901.379@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) writes:
>
>The amount of traffic related to X386 is picking up steadily and will
>probably consume this newsgroup.  So, what do you think about putting
>together a separate newsgroup: comp.unix.sysv386.x386 or comp.windows.x.x386
>which is dedicated to this product?
>
>What do you think?

Just what the doctor ordered!

Comp.windows.x.x386 sounds like the name to go with.


-- 
   /|_|\   Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ
  ( . . )  ejm@datalog.com
   \   /   ...!noao!datalog.com!ejm
    \_/