Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!385!14.0!Ann.Stalnaker
From: Ann.Stalnaker@p0.f14.n385.z1.fidonet.org (Ann Stalnaker)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: NAD Position Paper
Message-ID: <18596@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 11 Apr 91 04:35:46 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Ann.Stalnaker@p0.f14.n385.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:385/14.0 - Fingers Talk, Lawton OK
Lines: 18
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 14737

[This is from the Silent Talk Conference]

 > Why is the NAD position on cochlear implants for children,
 > absurd?
 >
 > Please note that the paper only addresses implants in
 > children, not in adults.

I think the reason the NAD addresses the implants towards children
as they know adults would be harder to convince or change their
minds.  I think NAD's reasoning is absurd - and is not rational
at all.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!385!14.0!Ann.Stalnaker
Internet: Ann.Stalnaker@p0.f14.n385.z1.fidonet.org