Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!300!7.2!Darrell.Shandrow
From: Darrell.Shandrow@p2.f7.n300.z1.fidonet.org (Darrell Shandrow)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: devices that talk
Message-ID: <18657@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 16:21:29 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Darrell.Shandrow@p2.f7.n300.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:300/7.2 - Reach Out, Tucson AZ
Lines: 17
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 14808

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

 BS> For skilled braille users, I think the braille display would be
 BS> considerably
 BS> more accurate and less prone to multiple interpretations than
 BS> speech.  Sure
 BS> do wish these braille displays would come down in price, though.

Remember, the braille display is usually slower than speech output and its
not always practical.  The best solution is to have both speech and
braille output but that'd be too expensive.  73

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!300!7.2!Darrell.Shandrow
Internet: Darrell.Shandrow@p2.f7.n300.z1.fidonet.org