Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!261!1055.0!Mary.Otten
From: Mary.Otten@p0.f1055.n261.z1.fidonet.org (Mary Otten)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: artic vs vocalize
Message-ID: <18687@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 12 Apr 91 21:17:46 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Mary.Otten@p0.f1055.n261.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:261/1055.0 - The Keeping Room, Baltimore MD
Lines: 22
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 14838

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

I wonder why you prefer vocalize and the sounding board over artic?
Aren't the synthesizers based on the same chip? What do you like about
vocalize that you don't about artic? I'm kind of interested in finding
out about voczlvocalize. Know very little about it. I've got artic, and
have been under the impression that vocalize is, or at least used to be,
kind of a bear bolnes program, unless you were already a genius, writing
macros etc. One of the problems with this new version or atic artic is
that it is more complex, if more powerful than the old one. I guess
there are a lot of folks out there who would follow the kiss principle,
kee keep it simple stupid, and let me worry about learning the
application program and not the speech. Anyway, I digress from the
original subject. Still, with all the new versions of software coming
out, artic, asap and rumored new version of vocalize, I"d like to get a
comparrison going.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!261!1055.0!Mary.Otten
Internet: Mary.Otten@p0.f1055.n261.z1.fidonet.org