Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey
From: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: artic vs vocalize
Message-ID: <18707@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 13 Apr 91 05:47:02 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/89.0 - BlinkLink, Pittsburgh PA
Lines: 24
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 14858

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

This is the seccond of two messages about Vocal-Eyes and the
Soundingboard.  Yes the Soundingblard is based on the same chip
as the Artic but a lot of improvements have been made.  It has
more expresion than your artic board, the letters T P have more
expresion than the Artic boards.  I just find the Soundingboard
a whole lot easier to underrstand but this is getting into
definite personal preference.  When you look at total features
of the package, to me there is no better package than Vocal-Eyes
and the Soundingboard.  My only criticism of the Soundingboard
is more because of my hearing instead of the board but it is
that the overall speech could be a little clearer.  In other
words I could not say that the clarityof speech was near the
Dectalk or Vert Plus but its powerpack of features more than
makes up for the speech quality.  It is those features that I
depend on to make my day to training and teaching, and personal
work so much easier. Grant

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey
Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org