Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey
From: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: KPR VS Arkenstone
Message-ID: <18708@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 13 Apr 91 05:47:33 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/89.0 - BlinkLink, Pittsburgh PA
Lines: 20
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 14859

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

On April 4, 1991 we are going to be having a demonstration here
in El Paso of the Arkanstone reader by A O S of Austin along
with the P C KPR.  A O S is really pushing the P C KPR and are
giving the Arkanstone sort of the seccond billing so to speak.
Don't get me wrong, the Poop sheet they sent me clearly stated
demonstration of the Arkanstone and P C KPR but then went into a
story about Raymond Kurzweil.  Is the PC KPR supposed to be
haster than the Personal Reader?  I guess what is stumping me is
what are the differences.  It seems as though to get a PC KPR
would be more of what we already have in the Personal reader.
It seems as though the Arkanstone would offer us some new and
technically better options. Grant

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey
Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org