Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!gateway!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines
From: ed@DAS.LLNL.GOV (Edward J. Suranyi)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: The Whole Story - IED's change of mind?
Message-ID: <9104120146.AA14511@das.llnl.gov>
Date: 12 Apr 91 01:46:13 GMT
References: <9104111919.AA14124@das.llnl.gov>
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@ims.alaska.edu
Organization: Dept. of Applied Science, UC Davis at LLNL
Lines: 22
Approved: Love-Hounds@hayes.ims.alaska.edu

In article <9104111919.AA14124@das.llnl.gov> I wrote:
>>I was reading some postings from a year or so ago and I noticed that IED
>>commented on TWS (book). He said that it was the best he had ever read -
>>either that or he said that it was an excellent bookithth only a few small
>>errors.
>>
>>mike
>
>Are you sure about this?  For one thing, Andy Marvick wrote a review
>of this book for Homeground back in 1989 in which he tore it apart.
>For another, I read love-hounds pretty carefully and I never saw
>him say anything like this.  Maybe it was a typo.  Could you e-mail
>me the entire posting?  I think he was probably referring to another
>book.

Well, Mike e-mailed me the article and I have to admit that I was
wrong.  IED did in fact say that about the book TWS.  I know that
he changed his mind not long afterwards.  So now I'm curious as well.
IED, could you explain this?

Ed
ed@das.llnl.gov