Xref: utzoo sci.electronics:19271 sci.optics:185 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!peregrine!ccicpg!legs!ssi!tom From: tom@syssoft.com (Rodentia) Newsgroups: sci.electronics,sci.optics Subject: Re: Sensitive Receivers (IR et al) Keywords: IR,reciever,digital Message-ID: <1991Apr10.040631.15699@syssoft.com> Date: 10 Apr 91 04:06:31 GMT References: <1991Apr3.211135.21492@syssoft.com> <1991Apr6.203416.14689@ctr.columbia.edu> Reply-To: tom@ssi.UUCP (Rodentia) Organization: Systems & Software, Inc., Irvine, CA Lines: 44 In article <1991Apr6.203416.14689@ctr.columbia.edu> yjj@ctr.columbia.edu (Yuan Jiang) writes: >In article <1991Apr3.211135.21492@syssoft.com> tom@syssoft.com (Rodentia) writes: >>Greetings: >> >>resembles a sine wave of 50KHz. I >>suppose this is due to the harmonics present in the assymetrical >>waveform. >> >Remeber sine wave has negative cycles. [sin(wt)]**2 is a >2w sine wave plus dc. > I understand that there is biasing involved, but the receiver is AC coupled. Where does the squaring of the wave come into play? The asymmetry to which I was referring was in the duty cycle. >> My second goal is to get the bloody 60Hz and 120Hz out of there. >>This is complicated by the fact that these sources of interference > >Will a filter help? > I imagine so, any suggestions as to what stage would be the filter? Is making one of the op amps an active filter best? > >> PhT - PhotoTransister (IR sensitive) > >They are known for being noisy and having low responsivity. >A PIN photodiode costs several dollars. > I wanted to be cheap, but I will look into decent parts. >Good luck Thanks. Update: I changed to a 1458 op amp (from a 353 BIFET). This is much more stable at high gains. It still seems to be sensitive to the volume control on the Radio Shack audio amp I connect. Any suggestions on how to match this to my circuit? Thanks all. -- Thomas Roden | tom@syssoft.com Systems and Software, Inc. | Voice: (714) 833-1700 x454 "If the Beagle had sailed here, Darwin would have | FAX: (714) 833-1900 come up with a different theory altogether." - me |