Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!aero-c!nadel
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: The problem in academia
Message-ID: <671413991@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 11 Apr 91 23:53:12 GMT
References: <1991Mar28.154345.12953@psych.toronto.edu> <jls.671252345@rutabaga>
Sender: news@aero.org
Organization: The Piranha Club
Lines: 11
Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Status: R
Originator: nadel@aerospace.aero.org


In article <jls.671252345@rutabaga> (Jim Showalter) writes:
>P.S. I was puzzled in the extreme by the complaint in the referenced
>     article that women's studies were becoming more of an objective
>     science and less of a political agenda. Isn't this precisely what
>     any discipline that wants to be taken seriously as a science must do? 

\begin{sarcasm}
But should not there be a quota for feminist studies?

Can't you see that demanding women to follow the same criteria
as men is just a form of discrimination against women?
\end{sarcasm}