Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!gatech!bloom-beacon!ora!ambar
From: jeanne@mica.berkeley.edu (Jeanne Dusseault)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: does healthy, mutual erotica exist?
Message-ID: <JEANNE.91Apr11123827@remarque.berkeley.edu>
Date: 12 Apr 91 21:13:31 GMT
References: <2995@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu>
	<1991Mar20.050507.24027@informix.com>
	<JEANNE.91Apr4221319@remarque.berkeley.edu> <jls.671251912@rutabaga>
Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz)
Organization: O'Reilly and Associates Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 18
Approved: ambar@ora.com


In article <jls.671251912@rutabaga>
uunet!igor!rutabaga!jls@ncar.UCAR.EDU (Jim Showalter) writes:

   >>Jeanne:
   >>I'm not labeling "Playboy" pornographic, however, its representation
   >>of women does not further a feminist objective.

   >Jim:
   >Speak for yourself. There are women who have posed for Playboy who are on
   >record as having said they did it FOR feminist reasons (one in particular

Read the statement again.  I said "PLAYBOY'S" REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN
does not further a feminist objective.  This has nothing to do with
women posing nude to further their own feminist agenda.

Jeanne
jeanne@mica.berkeley.edu