Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpda!hpcupt1!gstanfld
From: gstanfld@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Gill Stanfield)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.wanted
Subject: Re: Nuclear Detonation Model Wanted.
Message-ID: <-283049993@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com>
Date: 15 Apr 91 18:15:31 GMT
References: <1991Apr9.082100.9957@cc.newcastle.edu.au>
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino
Lines: 31

}In article <-283049997@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com> gstanfld@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com (Gill Sta
}nfield) writes:
}>I think you should just turn your computer off and kiss your *ss goodbye.
}>That should be an accurate model of the local effects of a nuke!
}>
}>:-)

}Holy smokes, what a brain child this guy must be.  One of these people
}who think that it is better to live in ignorance.

My apologies to Tony Gades and all other people who took my comment as a waste of
their disc space;
I only meant it in humor (hence, the ":-)")...

Please don't interpret my levity as a sign of ignorance or the desire to live in
ignorance.  Actually, I think it *would* be pretty interesting to see a model of
this stuff. I have discussed such simulations with people working at
Livermore and testing areas in New Mexico, but am unaware of the specifics names of
such simulations.  It appears that other people have posted some information that
will be worthwhile to Bernard Schmitz and others reading this notes group.

}I think that a simulation would be very interesting, and one might
}learn some physics.
}It is too bad that such a request immediately draws such comments as
}the one above, as they help no person that I know.

Perhaps one might learn to take life a little less seriously, Tony.

Regards,

gill