Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!unmvax!ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil!dayhoff
From: dayhoff@ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil (dayhoff@ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil  --  harv)
Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks
Subject: Re: Here is a tiny OS benchmark
Message-ID: <1991Apr16.140133.21890@ddnvx1.afwl.af.mil>
Date: 16 Apr 91 14:01:32 GMT
References: <MAC.91Apr15161150@gold.kpc.com> <1991Apr16.120134.5264@cs.utk.edu> <2308@spim.mips.COM>
Organization: Phillips Laboratory - Kirtland AFB
Lines: 28

In article <2308@spim.mips.COM>, hawkes@mips.com (John Hawkes) writes:
> In <1991Apr16.120134.5264@cs.utk.edu> Dave Sill <de5@ornl.gov> writes:
>><MAC.91Apr15161150@gold.kpc.com>, mac@gold.kpc.com (Mike McNamara) writes:
>>>
>>>Machine	OS	DPS	Load
>>>Sun 3/50	4.0	3	Unloaded
>>>Sun 3/280	4.1.1	6	Normal fileserver load
>>>Stardent 30xx	4.0	12	Unloaded
>>>My machine	--	26	Unloaded
>>>
>>>How does your machine compare?
>>
>>IBM RS 320      3.1     23      Unloaded
>>DEC 5000/200    4.1     35      Unloaded
>>DEC 5810        3.1     15      Light
>>Cray X-MP       5.1.11  27      Light
>>Sun SS1+        4.1      9      Light
>>DEC 2100        4.0     13      Light
> 
> MIPS M/2000	4.52	33	Light
> MIPS RC6280	4.52+	50	Unloaded
> -- 
VAXstation3100  4.0      8      light, 8 MB mem
VAXserver3xxx   4.0      9      light, except for net, 16 Meg
--
RS (harvey) Dayhoff  OL-NS/ENSB   (505) 846-5392
The USAF, and ASD have no opinions; as for me, I am a scientest...
the TRUTH is the collective best guess.