Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!eniac.seas.upenn.edu!awhite From: awhite@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Andrew J. White) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: v11i171: locate, cmd line cursor position (part 01/01) Keywords: batch, util, cursor Message-ID: <41431@netnews.upenn.edu> Date: 18 Apr 91 01:53:25 GMT References: <3717@sixhub.UUCP> <1991Apr14.172803.19169@uwasa.fi> Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu Reply-To: awhite@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Andrew J. White) Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 29 Nntp-Posting-Host: eniac.seas.upenn.edu In article <1991Apr14.172803.19169@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes: >In article <3717@sixhub.UUCP> ibmbin-request@crdgw1.crd.ge.com writes: %%LOCATE is a simple utility which places the cursor at x and y %%coordinates passed on the command line (see documentation). Please :It's always very good to have new utilities into circulation. But I :am slightly at a loss here why locating the cursor with ansi codes :in batch file operations is not sufficient. What angle am I (and :perhaps other users) missing here? Or is it just that the format of :a locate command is more strightforward than the more complicated :ansi codes (which require an ansi compatible driver loaded)? :................................................................... :Prof. Timo Salmi :Internet: ts@chyde.uwasa.fi Funet: gado::salmi Bitnet: salmi@finfun : As the author of the above-mentioned program, I find it useful because of its straightforwardness and because, frankly, I have never had the inclination to learn ANSI codes and don't even use an ANSI driver. I find that ANSI drivers, even the fast ones like from PC Magazine, *do* slow down screen writes in text mode. -Andrew -- __________________________________________________________________________ Andrew J. White | U. of Pennsylvania | awhite@eniac.seas.upenn.edu Comp. Science 1993 | School of Engineering | whiteaj@clutx.clarkson.edu