Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!fernwood!lia!jgro
From: jgro@lia (Jeremy Grodberg)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Posting C++ sources
Message-ID: <1991Apr17.222548.28053@lia>
Date: 17 Apr 91 22:25:48 GMT
References: <1991Apr15.171030.7130@athena.mit.edu> <1550@tronsbox.xei.com>
Reply-To: jgro@lia.com (Jeremy Grodberg)
Lines: 23

In article <1550@tronsbox.xei.com> tron1@tronsbox.xei.com (Kenneth Jamieson) writes:
>In article <1991Apr15.171030.7130@athena.mit.edu> bjaspan@athena.mit.edu (Barr3y Jaspan) writes:
>>Is there such a group?  Is comp.lang.c appropriate?  Where does everyone else
>>post their public-domain classes, etc.?  Note that I am not offering to
>>moderate such a group, go about getting it created, and so on.
>
>	You know .. this is a really important question. With the 
>modulare nature of C++ , PD classes are inevitable. We need to set up
>at least a alt* group.
>

The newly formed "comp.sources.reviewed" is an ideal place for this.  
Code is peer-reviewed before being distributed over the net, and thus
people can have some degree of confidence that the distributed code
is not obviuosly flawed.  I hope this becomes the standard place to 
distrubute source code libraries.

Check it out.  And volunteer to review some code.

Disclaimer:  I have nothing to do with comp.sources.reviewed, yet.
-- 
Jeremy Grodberg      "Show me a new widget that's bug-free, and I'll show
jgro@lia.com         you something that's been through several releases."