Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!uwvax!astroatc!vidiot!brown From: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: including postscript files in troff files Message-ID: <1634@vidiot.UUCP> Date: 18 Apr 91 03:41:38 GMT References: <5353@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1595@vidiot.UUCP> <1383@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> <1612@vidiot.UUCP> <1407@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> Reply-To: brown@vidiot.UUCP (Vidiot) Organization: Vidiot's Hangout Lines: 32 In article <1407@ecicrl.ocunix.on.ca> clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) writes: < &1) | cat-2-whatever I can't find my docs on the CAT output. In any event, there obviously has to be a letter M, otherwise there would have been many screwed up documents. I have to assume that you mean the octal code 115 is not used in the CAT output codes. This happens to correspond to the letter M. Therefore, if that code appears in the CAT output (actually it doesn't), then it means something special to the post-processor. Neat little trick. The PostScript inclusion files that I have have fixed positions in the PostScript file and they are not meant to be positioned by the troff itself. It is meant to be positioned with PostScript code. That way the troff source doesn't have to worry about where the characters are positioned. But, there are obviously many situations where this does have to happen. Thanks for the info. I will keep it handy. Boy, the games people play to get around problems. :-) -- harvard\ att!nicmad\ spool.cs.wisc.edu!astroatc!vidiot!brown Vidiot ucbvax!uwvax..........!astroatc!vidiot!brown rutgers/ decvax!nicmad/ INTERNET:vidiot!brown%astroatc@spool.cs.wisc.edu