Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!mcdchg!ddsw1!zane
From: zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Sameer Parekh)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Caller ID problems
Message-ID: <1991Apr14.210009.1644@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Date: 14 Apr 91 21:00:09 GMT
References: <1991Apr10.155422.26742@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <STANTON.91Apr10105447@Neon.Stanford.EDU> <Ic0sYPQ91EAf8EqOYb@rchland.ibm.com>
Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Wheeling, IL
Lines: 15

In article <Ic0sYPQ91EAf8EqOYb@rchland.ibm.com> seurer+@rchland.ibm.com (Bill Seurer) writes:
[Good plan deleted]
>
>Why wouldn't this make everyone (well, almost everyone) happy?
>
>- Bill Seurer      IBM: seurer@rchland  Prodigy: CNSX71A
>  Rochester, MN    Internet: seurer@rchland.vnet.ibm.com

	Well, the phone companies like to charge about 1.10 for each call
you make that is anonymous.  I would assume you would like it to be free,
but the phone companies won't like that, and they are who count, not the
people.

-- 
The Ravings of the Insane Maniac Sameer Parekh -- zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM