Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!sjsca4!poffen
From: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: editor
Message-ID: <1991Apr15.205837.21767@sj.ate.slb.com>
Date: 15 Apr 91 20:58:37 GMT
References: <1991Apr10.131643.16038@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> <1991Apr10.184259.2993@demott.com> <106457@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1991Apr11.231058.12652@demott.com>
Reply-To: poffen@SunOS (Russ Poffenberger)
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, ATE division, San Jose, Ca.
Lines: 21

In article <1991Apr11.231058.12652@demott.com> kdq@demott.com (Kevin D. Quitt) writes:
>In article <106457@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> krouse-p@liter.cis.ohio-state.edu (Pierce Krouse) writes:
>>Hmmm .. not one to knock Epsilon, having never used it, but BRIEF will do all
>>the things you mention above.  How is Epsilon better?  Maybe I misunderstand
>>what you are saying in the features list above.  I'm just curious as to the
>>differences that must exist.
>

Sounds like this could be another matter of taste type arguments like UNIX vs.
MAC vs. DOS.

Everybody has their own opinions, basically the RIGHT editor is what you feel
comfortable with.

Personally I like the new Windows 3.0 port of micro-emacs. When under windows
I MUST have a true Windows app editor so that I can use the mouse and such.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254