Xref: utzoo comp.unix.wizards:24972 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:15712
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu!ejbehr
From: ejbehr@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Eric Behr)
Subject: Re: Thin wire or twisted pair?
Message-ID: <1991Apr18.033345.10398@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 1991 03:33:45 GMT
Distribution: na
Reply-To: ejbehr@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Eric Behr)
Organization: Central Illinois Surfing Club

andrew@jhereg.osa.com (Andrew C. Esh) writes:
>Just a suggestion, but wouldn't this subject work a little better in
>comp.dcom.lans? The discussion there is about cable and boxes. My
>impression of comp.protocols.tcp-ip is that it is above the physical layer
>of the OSI stack.

In fact, a discussion about relative merits of thin Ethernet and 10BaseT
has been going on there for a couple of weeks. I'm afraid I caused it by my
question   8-()  Very true, that doesn't necessarily have much to do with
TCP/IP. I've gathered some of the responses - will be glad to send them on
request. Please use mail, not a followup to this group.    E.
-- 
Eric Behr, Illinois State University, Mathematics Department
Internet: ejbehr@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu    Bitnet: ebehr@ilstu